In my last blog post, I wrote about an
idea for a more efficient method for getting things into space. I
also mentioned more efficient engine design with lower throughput.
That is what I will be writing about in this blog post. The type of
propulsion that I will be writing about will be an ion thruster. This
type of thruster is only viable in space, it does not produce much
thrust, but it uses only absolutely tiny amounts of fuel. It works by
ionizing xenon and repelling the ions electromagnetically at
extremely high velocities.
There is one main positive quality to
this type of propulsion (high-five to whoever got that joke). This is
the fuel efficiency. It is more fuel efficient because of the higher
speed at which the working mass is ejected. This is due to Newton's
Second law which is commonly shortened to F=ma, or Force equals Mass
times Acceleration. This means that in order to decrease the amount
of mass required (fuel), you would need to give it more acceleration.
This is achieved by the electromagnetic acceleration. While the space
shuttle's main engine had a exhaust velocity of about 4.5km/s, the
ion thruster would have an exhaust velocity of about 20-50km/s,
making it much more efficient. An example of an achieved efficiency
with this type of thruster is the Deep Space 1 spacecraft, which
accelerated by 4300 m/s with only about 74 kg of xenon.
There are also two major negative
qualities to this type of propulsion (same joke). One of these is the
fact that it cannot be used in atmosphere. The electrical fields and
electrodes require a near vacuum to function. The second is the low
thrust. The thrust of current ion thrusters range from 20 to 250
milinewtons, which is tiny compared to the Space Shuttle Main
Engine's 2,279 kilonewtons of force. The Space Shuttle Main Engine
has about 9,116,000 to 113,950,000 times as much thrust.
Overall, in my opinion, the idea of
low thrust, high efficiency engines should be explored more. In my
opinion, the lower thrust is counted for in the less fuel it has to
push and in the increased fuel economy. In my opinion, these types of
engines could be how we power long distance ships for the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment